In-Depth Review and Scam Check: Is Book of Mew (BOMEW) on Solana a Legit Project or a Rug Pull?

The crypto space on Solana is increasingly crowded, with numerous projects promising innovative features and strong community backing. Among these was Book of Mew (BOMEW), a project that positioned itself as a fusion of MEME culture and profound wisdom, aiming to combine entertainment with community-driven values. However, with the project’s official website now unreachable, it’s crucial to scrutinize its background, technical foundation, and the red flags that suggest potential scams or rug pulls.

Overview of Book of Mew (BOMEW)

Launched on the Solana blockchain, the Book of Mew aimed to establish a community-centered meme token symbolized by its native token, $BOMEW. According to the available data, the project embraced a narrative of spiritual mastery and community evolution, primarily using memes and literature-inspired themes. The token's initial supply was fixed at 1,000,000,000 tokens, with the mint authority renounced early to enhance trust. The project's social presence included a Telegram group with 66 members and a Twitter account, though without available followers or engagement metrics, which raises questions about its community reach.

The project claimed to integrate decentralized storage for its metadata and aimed at creating a unique NFT ecosystem, with one of its highlights being the immutable metadata standard for its tokens. Despite these claims, no public roadmap or detailed developer documentation seems to be accessible presently.

Financial metrics for BOMEW are negligible—no trading volume is reported, and the market cap remains zero, indicating that the project did not gain meaningful liquidity or trader interest. The community score stands at 35 out of 100, and the overall fundamentals score is approximately 69.58, reflecting a middling technical assessment but insufficient to validate long-term viability.

Auditing and Technical Security via Cyberscope

Based on Cyberscope's security assessment, Book of Mew received a high security score of approximately 95.89%, suggesting that from a technical standpoint, the deployed smart contract was free from critical vulnerabilities at the time of audit. The audit confirmed the following:

• The token contract was an SPL token with a fixed supply of 1 billion tokens, with the mint authority and freeze authority renounced—an attempt to prevent malicious minting or altering tokenomics post-deployment.
• All critical security vulnerabilities flagged were high criticality but no exploitable issues were detected during the audit snapshot.
• The project utilized decentralized storage for metadata, reducing central points of failure.

However, a high security score does not equate to project legitimacy. It only indicates that, at the time of review, the smart contract code was technically sound. It does not account for project mismanagement, fake promises, or the potential for a rug pull if the team acts maliciously or abandons the project.

Red Flags and Signs of a Potential Scam or Rug Pull

The most alarming red flag is the current inaccessibility of the project’s official website. This is often a precursor to exit scams or rug pulls, where developers suddenly disappear with invested funds. Specific warning signs include:

• Website Outage: The disappearance of the project’s official site indicates a possible shutdown or abandonment, which is common among rug pulls.
• Community Silence: Minimal or no active social media engagement, coupled with almost no community presence or updates, implies the project lacked genuine interest or support.
• Liquidity and Trading Volume: Zero reported trading volume and market cap strongly suggest that no decentralized exchanges or liquidity pools hold any funds for the token.
• Unclear Roadmap and Developer Transparency: The absence of a detailed roadmap or developer documentation makes it impossible to verify future plans or accountability, a classic sign of a potential scam.
• Audit Limitations: While the project’s token contract passed an audit, the audit did not necessarily include comprehensive project scope or community safeguards.

These are pattern behaviors frequently observed in crypto scams and rug pulls, especially in the meme coin sphere, where hype often precedes sudden disappearance.

Furthermore, the total absence of a verified team, detailed project goals, or active community engagement raises doubts about the legitimacy of the project’s claims.

Conclusion and Lessons Learned

Based on the available evidence, including the Cyberscope audit results, community data, and the now-inaccessible official website, Book of Mew (BOMEW) exhibits many characteristics typical of a potential rug pull. Even though the smart contract was technically audited and secure, the absence of a functioning website, liquidity, and an active community strongly imply that this project was either poorly managed or intentionally designed to defraud investors.

Investors should always exercise extreme caution with projects that have vague documentation, disappear without notice, or lack real-world trading activity. The crypto industry demands transparency, accountability, and community verification—none of which are present here.

In the future, always verify the project's transparency, check for active community engagement, review security audits in conjunction with project scope, and remain skeptical of projects that go offline suddenly. Remember, a high security score on a smart contract does not guarantee project legitimacy— due diligence is paramount.

Stay vigilant, do your own research, and avoid investing in projects that exhibit these red flags. The crypto world is fraught with scams, and only careful analysis can help you avoid costly mistakes.